US Climate Change Science Program
Updated 11 October, 2003

Overview of the
Climate Change Science Program
By Richard H. Moss, Director
US Global Change Research Program Office
Presented at the U.S. Climate Change Science Workshop
Tuesday, 3 December 2002, Marriott Wardman Park Hotel

 

Note
Bracketed items refer to slides in the separate Microsoft  Powerpoint presentation.

 

 

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Richard H. Moss, Director, US Global Change Research Program Office

Good morning Admiral Lautenbacher, Dr. Mahoney, colleagues, and distinguished participants.

[Title slide] I am appearing before you this morning in my capacity as Executive Director of the US Global Change Research Program. I started my responsibilities as director in May 2000, and since that date have spent a great deal of time and energy on activities that are now embodied in the draft strategic plan.

[This presentation...] Dr. Mahoney has already described the relationship of the USGCRP and the Climate Change Research Initiative (CCRI), launched by President George W. Bush last year. My role this morning is to give an overview of the research and products we are proposing to develop. I will begin by describing the mission of the Climate Change Science Program and the process through which the strategic plan has been developed. Next, I will describe the essential features of the program, including (1) near-term (i.e., 2-4 year) research and decision support resources focused on climate change, (2) long-term research on additional global environmental changes, and (3) management approaches for balancing and integrating research across the diverse agencies and departments of the Federal government that participate in the CCSP. Finally, I will conclude by mentioning some topics on which we are particularly looking forward to receiving comment, knowing full well that the discussions this week will not be bounded by anything that I might highlight this morning. We anticipate and welcome a wide-ranging debate during the next few days.

[CCSP mission] As Dr. Mahoney has described, the CCSP seeks to provide a useful return to society for its investment in research. Meeting this challenge defines the mission of the CCSP, which simply put is to "Provide science-based information on climate and global change to inform public debate, policymaking, and management of natural resources." In order to carry out this mission, the program will need to integrate information about climate, ecological systems, the economy, and the energy system.

[Science-based questions...] The program needs to fulfill its mission for a broad range of issues currently the focus of societal debate and decisionmaking. Let me note briefly some of the issues that seem particularly important.

  • A first set of issues that need to be addressed concerns the nature of observed changes in climate and environmental systems. The National Research Council -- the operational arm of the US National Academy of Sciences -- has stressed the need to better understand the causes of observed warming. The NRC concluded that "the changes observed over the last several decades are likely mostly due to human activities, but we cannot rule out that some significant part of these changes are also a reflection of natural variability."
  • A second set of issues for exploration in the program involves how climate and the Earth system will respond to future natural and human-induced forces. Currently, models project a wide range of climate response over the 21st century, from 2.5 to 10.4 degrees F (as reported by the NRC). This wide range reflects uncertainties in both future emissions and concentrations of greenhouse gases, as well as differing climate sensitivities of the various models used in the simulations. Reducing the uncertainty in projections will require advances in our understanding of various feedback processes. Progress on these and additional issues will not only improve projections of global mean changes, but also help in improving regional projections of change.
  • A third set of issues before the public and decisionmakers is how sensitive and adaptable are ecosystems -- and related socio-economic systems -- to interacting changes in climate and other environmental conditions? Providing information on climate effects and adaptation is a difficult challenge, in part because confidence in regional projections of temperature, precipitation, soil moisture, extreme events, and other attributes of climate remains low. But an acknowledged approach to this problem is to identify how outputs or structures of different ecological or socio-economic systems may respond to hypothetical changes in climate through careful experimentation and hypothesis testing. Researchers will also need to step up investigation of the technologies, practices, and factors that facilitate adaptation in both ecological and socio-economic systems.
  • Finally, decisionmakers are in the process of evaluating the costs and benefits of different response strategies, including adaptation and a variety of technologies and measures for reducing net greenhouse gas emissions. Evaluating these options requires addressing the full range of climate, ecological, economic, and energy system issues highlighted by Dr. Mahoney. Researchers cannot provide precise estimates or answers, but with existing knowledge they can provide important comparative information about the relative costs and benefits of different choices.
  • [Resource Management...] In addition to national policy issues, decisionmakers and resource managers are confronting questions about development and management of climate-sensitive resources. Observations of current conditions, forecasts of climate phenomena such as the El Nino-Southern Oscillation, and even projections of longer-term variability and change, can be useful to a variety of managers and planners, if focused on a specific decision context and conveyed in ways that describe both the extent and limits of knowledge. Some examples of applications of global change information already underway or under development include:

  • Anticipating effects of pollution in an air shed from remote locations through observations and modeling of long-range transport processes
  • Linking watershed scale hydrologic models with agricultural and economic models to assess tradeoffs among competing uses and needs (including consumption, reuse, agricultural output, and water required to maintain ecosystems and environmental quality)
  • Evaluating the sensitivity of forest growth to altered temperature and precipitation (fire and long-term ecosystem management)
  • Analyzing the role of climate information in the context of managing energy supply/demand
  • [CCSP Science for Society...] The aspiration of the CCSP to provide decision support resources to inform societal debate and decisionmaking is depicted in this simple flow chart, which illustrates some of the key "inputs" that we will draw on, some of the decision-support resources and other "outputs" that we are planning to deliver, and some of the societal "outcomes" that we hope to facilitate. The inputs include research in the core areas of the program focused on relevant questions, and supporting observations and modeling activities. The decision support resources include reports and findings on high priority topics, scenario comparisons and evaluation, and tools and methods to support resource management, including enhanced access to observations and other information.

    [Both Focus and Breadth...] Providing information for societal debate and decisionmaking on these national and resource management issues will require the CCSP to include both a near term focus on climate change as well as a long-term focus on the full range of global change research issues. This dual challenge of developing focus while maintaining breadth has been a recurring theme of the reports about the USGCRP from the NRC over the past decade. The Climate Change Research Initiative provides a focus on near-term climate-change deliverables. The ongoing Earth systems research of the USGCRP provides attention to global change issues that will require sustained research for more than 2-4 years, as well as the future development of applications of research to decisionmaking.

    [Earth system cartoon] This stylized depiction of the Earth's global environmental systems is a composite of several figures used in the IPCC's Third Assessment Synthesis Report. It is intended to illustrate some of the many factors and sub-systems that must be addressed to understand the response of components of the Earth system to natural and human forces. The CCRI will accelerate progress on some parts of the system, particularly a number of atmospheric components associated with understanding climate change. But research will need to continue on all aspects of the Earth's environment, for example on surface hydrology, on the global carbon cycle including its ocean component, on ecosystems, and on alterations to the land surface. These all affect climate at global to regional scales. And they all have intrinsic importance.

    [Strategic Plan Development...] Before describing the approach taken in the strategic plan, I want to say something about the process used to prepare it. It is intended to illustrate some of the many factors and sub-systems that must be addressed to understand the response of components of the Earth system to natural and human forces. The CCRI will accelerate progress on some parts of the system, particularly a number of atmospheric components associated with understanding climate change. But research will need to continue on all aspects of the Earth's environment, for example on surface hydrology, on the global carbon cycle including its ocean component, on ecosystems, and on alterations to the land surface. These all affect climate at global to regional scales. And they all have intrinsic importance.

    [Strategic Plan Development...] Before describing the approach taken in the strategic plan, I want to say something about the process used to prepare it.

    The research community, under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences, has provided a great deal of input to the development of the program over the past decade. Several NAS reports have been particularly important to the overall framing of this plan, including  Research Pathways (1999), The Science of Regional and Global Change (2000), and Answers to Key Questions (2001). In the future, the Academy will play an important role in evaluating this draft of the plan and the open comment process we are beginning today. We thank the members of the Committees and Boards that provide this crucial advice.

    The plan was drafted by Federal scientists and research program managers. The draft underwent several rounds of internal review and revision. I commend and thank the Federal scientists and managers for their work and creativity.

    This workshop is part of the effort to openly debate the program and its focus. Additional public comments will be provided in the weeks following the workshop and accepted up to mid-January. Once comments have been sorted and evaluated, the CCSP will revise the draft plan before completing the draft and submitting it to Congress and the National Academy, as required under the terms of the 1990 Global Change Research Act. We will work to make this process as transparent as possible.

    [Overview...] The draft plan itself is structured in three parts. Part I  describes near-term decision support related to climate change, with emphasis on deliverables over the next 2-4 years. Part II  describes global change research focused on additional global environmental changes. As required by the program's enabling legislation, this part of the plan has a ten-year focus.  Part III of the plan describes communications, international cooperation, and the management approaches that have been identified to help coordinate and integrate the activities of the diverse agencies and departments that participate in the CCSP. Let me review these in slightly greater detail.

    [Climate Change Focused Decision Support] Part I, the climate-focused decision support component, includes three major areas of activity:

  • Research Focused on Key Climate Change Uncertainties
  • Climate Quality Observations, Monitoring, and Data Management 
  • Decision Support Resources
  • [Research Focused on Three...] The first area of activity, described in chapter 2  of the draft plan, includes research focused on three key climate change questions:

  • What are the relative contributions of different aerosols to climate change? (both black carbon and sulfate aerosols)
  • What are the magnitudes and distributions of North American carbon sources and sinks, and what are the processes controlling their dynamics? (embedded in research on the entire global carbon cycle)
  • How much of expected climate change is the consequence of feedback processes? (Clouds and water vapor feedbacks? Polar regions?)
  • [Climate Quality Observations...] The second activity included in Part I will improve climate-related observations, monitoring, and data management systems. The questions include:

  • How has global climate changed over the past fifty years or more, and what level of confidence do existing data provide in attributing change? (reanalysis of data)
  • What is the current state of the climate, how does it compare with the past, and how can observations be improved? (state of different components of the observing system and what they indicate about the current state of these components)
  • How real are the differences in surface and tropospheric temperature trends?
  • How do we improve observations of biological and ecological systems to understand their response to climate variability and change? (a new initiative)
  • How accessible is the climate record? (data and information systems)
  • [Decision Support Resources] The third area addressed in Part I is development of decision support resources for national policy and resource management over the next 2-4 years. Included are activities that focus on:

  • Analytic techniques for serving decision needs (these techniques include scenario development, which is an extremely important component that integrates information from the many areas of research and applies them to address specific "if..., then..." questions related to evaluation of measures or options)
  • Applied climate modeling (linked, "two-center" approach)
  • Resources for risk analysis and decisionmaking under uncertainty (extension and application of existing techniques to climate change decisionmaking under uncertainty)
  • Each of these areas will be subject of discussion in breakout groups.

    [Broad, Ongoing Earth ...] Part II of the plan focuses on global change research. It includes all the major components of the Earth's global environmental systems and meets the requirements of the Global Change Research Act of 1990, which defines global change as: "changes in the global environment (including alterations in climate, land productivity, oceans or other water resources, atmospheric chemistry, and ecological systems) that may alter the capacity of the Earth to sustain life." Part II includes plans for 8 interdisciplinary research elements, including:

  • Atmospheric Composition
  • Climate Variability and Change
  • Water Cycle
  • Land Use/Land Cover Change
  • Carbon Cycle
  • Ecosystems
  • Human Contributions and Responses to Global Environmental Change
  • Grand Challenges in Modeling, Observations, and Information Systems
  • Each element addresses 3-6 high-level questions that have both societal and scientific importance. For each of these questions, the plan includes a brief description of the current state of knowledge, illustrative subsidiary research questions, inputs that are required to make progress, and products that will result from the research on different time scales. Important linkages with other national or international programs are highlighted at the conclusion of the chapter describing each of these research elements. In some cases there is overlap with the climate-focused decision support activities described in Part I. But this overlap is intentional and is designed to provide continuity for ongoing research that exceeds the 2-4 year focus on the CCRI described in Part I. Part II builds on the USGCRP of the 1990s but develops important additional capabilities. Greater attention to deliverables and products is a response to the President's management agenda.

    [Climate Variability...] As an example of the types of questions addressed in the research elements, I will briefly highlight the top-tier questions addressed in the climate variability and change research element. These include:

  • What is the sensitivity of climate change projections to feedbacks in the climate system?
  • To what extent can predictions of climate variability and projections of long-term climate change be improved?
  • What is the likelihood of abrupt climate changes?
  • Whether and how are the frequencies, intensities, and locations of extreme events altered by natural climate variations and human-induced climate changes?
  • Development of applications, i.e., how can interactions between producers and users of climate information be structured to ensure essential information is identified and provided?
  • [Research Elements Include Societal Interactions] The research elements include studies that address sensitivity, adaptability, and other aspects of the interactions between society and environmental change. This research involves developing new capabilities, data and information sources, and analytic techniques. Some examples of this include:

  • Atmospheric Composition Q3: : What are the effects of long-range transport of pollution on regional air quality, crops, and ecosystems?
  • Water Cycle Q5:  Implications of global water cycle variability and change for human societies and ecosystems?
  • Land Use/Land Cover Change: All questions assess interactions of society and environment, either impacts or effects
  • [Societal Interactions]

  • Carbon Cycle Q6: How will the Earth system respond to options for managing carbon, and what scientific information is needed for evaluating these options?
  • Ecosystems Q2 and 3: Effects of global change on ecosystem goods and services, and options for management?
  • Human Contributions: Driving forces, and factors affecting sensitivity and adaptation (including health)
  • While research questions on these topics are included in the plan, we realize that addressing these questions will require development of new capabilities within the program over the coming decade.

    [Program Management] Part III includes activities oriented to outreach, international collaboration, and management. Dr. Mahoney has already touched on all of these in his remarks. I will add a few additional observations about management, because of its importance given that CCSP capabilities and resources are distributed across 13 agencies and departments. The CCSP will employ several mechanisms for program management that have proven successful over the last several years within the USGCRP. These include:

    • Scientific guidance (through advisory committees that develop science plans and provide ongoing review of implementation)
    • Interagency planning and implementation (of program managers to integrate programs and work out implementation and cross-agency collaboration)
    • CCSP/SGCR direction, which will require the CCSP to
      • Set and refine integrated program goals/priorities
      • Review all programs that contribute to climate and global change science
      • Interact with external advisory groups

    These approaches to management facilitate coordination across CCSP departments and agencies, drawing on the resources and expertise of both research and mission-oriented agencies.

    [CCSP Workshop...] This concludes my overview of the CCSP. After an important presentation from Assistant Secretary of Energy David Garman about the Climate Change Technology Program, it will be time for you to begin the debate about whether the program is addressing the right set of issues, and whether its proposed focus will meet the nation's and the international community's needs for information over the near term and during the coming decade. In assembling the strategic plan, we have worked hard to identify what we perceived to be important and worthwhile products that have the potential to enhance societal outcomes. We have attempted to provide initial timelines for the completion of research and the development of decision support resources and other products.

    We welcome your comments on the orientation of the program, on the utility of the products, and on the feasibility of developing them on the rough timelines that we have outlined. We also encourage you to help us identify gaps in the program, such as opportunities for additional work on adaptation, or unnecessary overlaps in the topics covered in the various research elements. Finally, we realize that there are numerous inter-relationships among the many areas of research that the draft strategy outlines. We have planned for some of these, but know that others remain unaccounted for. We hope that through your comments, you can help us to identify additional inter-relationships and opportunities for integration.

    On behalf of all of those who have contributed to development of this research plan, I thank you for your participation in this workshop, and for the comments that I know will help to strengthen our approach to providing vital information for our nation and others around the world.


     

    US Climate Change Science Program, Suite 250, 1717 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: +1 202 223 6262. Fax: +1 202 223 3065. Email: . Web: www.climatescience.gov. Webmaster:
    US Climate Change Science Program Home Page